In a conflict amongst calls, which has the highest priority?

In surveying, when conflicts arise among different "calls" such as monuments, courses, or distances, the established priority hierarchy determines which element should prevail. Natural monuments hold the highest priority in this hierarchy. This is attributed to their permanence and visibility, making them less susceptible to change compared to human-made objects.

Natural monuments, like trees, rivers, or rock formations, often serve as reliable points of reference in land surveys. They are typically more stable over time than artificial monuments, which can be moved or destroyed. When there is a discrepancy in a property boundary or defining feature, surveyors will prioritize the location of natural monuments to maintain accuracy and consistency in establishing boundaries. This understanding of prioritizing natural monuments is crucial for ensuring that the survey remains aligned with physical features that have inherently existed, as opposed to features that may change or be misrepresented.

In terms of why the other choices rank lower, artificial monuments are not as reliable as natural ones due to possible human error or displacement. Calling for a course, which refers to the direction or angle related to a boundary line, and a call for distance, which measures the length of a boundary, can both vary based on interpretation or measurement errors. Hence, when resolving conflicts in boundary delineation, reliance on